home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Power Tools 1993 October - Disc 2
/
Power Tools (Disc 2)(October 1993)(HP).iso
/
hotlines
/
network
/
lmxtwo
/
lmxtwo02.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-02-19
|
8KB
|
150 lines
LAN Manager/X
Question & Answer
-------------------
1. What is HP's commitment to LAN Manager?
HP is continuing to make investments in providing LAN Manager based
solutions to it's customers. HP supports the top PC NOS's in the
industry and LAN Manager is one of these. HP's strategy is to partner
with the industry leaders to provide the best solutions to our
customers.
For the HP9000, in May, 1992, HP began shipping the LM/X server which
supports Microsoft LAN Manager 2.1 clients as well as allows file
locking/sharing between DOS and Apple MAC clients. HP has partnered
with Pacer Software to provide Apple MAC client connectivity to our
LM/X server. Additionally, we have plans to provide LAN Manager 2.1a
server capabilities by midyear 1993.
Extensive performance benchmarking has been completed on the S8x7
systems and the results look great! A copy of the performance
information can be obtained from the GSY Hotline under the subject
"LMX8X7".
Our HP3000 solution consists of LAN Manager Named Pipes for client
server application development and Resource Sharing/XL for file and
print sharing. We are continuing to support the current versions of
Microsoft's clients to access our servers. For potential new
customers, you should utilize the consultative approach to determine
the solution that best meets your customers' needs.
The marketplace did not respond as quickly as analysts/Microsoft would
have liked, therefore LAN Manager is not the leading PC NOS, but is
among the leaders in the industry. Microsoft is committed to LAN
Manager and continues to invest in it. HP believes that LAN Manager is
an integral part of our client/server offering and is therefore
continuing to invest to new versions of LAN Manager.
2. When should customers buy LAN Manager vs Netware?
HP's goal is to make as many system server sales as possible. With the
offering of the top PC NOS's we want to allow the customer to choose.
We have established the following key criteria:
The application may dictate the NOS - if an application only runs on
one network and that application is mandatory, then the network choice
is made.
The network is already installed and the user is happy - by offering
the choice PC NOS, HP will work with the customer to add the new
capability he/she is looking for to the existing network. If the
installed network is MS-NET, then migration to LAN Manager is the
obvious choice.
There is no network currently installed - if the customer is undecided
and there is no network constraints imposed by the application being
considered and enterprise wide networking is thought to be an important
capability, then a TCP/IP based network should be recommended. Today,
LAN Manager is the only native TCP/IP implementation HP offers. Novell
will be shipping NetWare with v3.11 (386) and has announced intentions
to support it on Portable Netware in the future. At this time, LAN
Manager is the better enterprise wide TCP/IP solution.
If a system sale is not involved, then the customer should be sent to a
Vectra dealer, that is, is the network is a PC only network.
3. What new features are available with the latest release of LM/X?
The latest release of LAN Manager (internal name release C) includes
support of LAN Manager 2.1 clients and file locking to allow MAC and
DOS clients to share files. This release is shipping now for S/700/800
and June 1st for S/300/400. Product numbers are B1011C for 700/800,
and B1003C for 300/400. The new server version is 1.3. (Please note,
there was not a 1.2 version).
4. How do I order LM/X for my customer?
Send a desk message to the Network Hotline with "LMXORD" as the
subject. A reply will be sent to you with the ordering instructions for
a new customer, as well as those wanting to upgrade older versions.
5. What is HP's relationship with Microsoft?
HP did the initial implementation of LAN Manager on a UNIX platform for
Microsoft. This version was based on Microsoft's LAN Manager 1.0
product for OS/2 systems. This version and a follow-on upgrade
(version 1.1) were delivered to Microsoft for licensing to the rest of
the industry. HP has an OEM relationship with Microsoft which means
that HP licenses the core LAN Manager technology from Microsoft and
completes the port to the HP-UX platform. This allows HP to minimize
its investment in core LAN Manager technology and maximize investment
in adding value to this core technology.
At the same time HP and Microsoft co-developed the LM/X 1.0 and 1.1
versions, NCR separately developed and delivered their implementation
of a LAN Manager for UNIX OEM kit. The fact that there were two
versions of LAN Manager for UNIX was confusing, thus Microsoft chose to
converge the two implementations. It was decided that the NCR platform
would be used for convergence. NCR is currently the co-developer with
Microsoft for LAN Manager for UNIX, while HP is an OEM reselling the
LM/X product on HP systems.
NCR is responsible for the development of future versions of LAN
Manager for UNIX systems. These new versions will be based on
Microsoft's LAN Manager for OS/2 requirements and additional
specifications jointly defined by NCR and Microsoft. This arrangement
ensures continued consistency and compatibility between LAN Manager for
OS/2 and LAN Manager for UNIX Systems in terms of application
programming interfaces (APIs), interoperability, features, and
functions. Both companies license and promote LAN Manager for UNIX
worldwide. HP continues to license the product from Microsoft.
6. When will HP have a LM/X 2.x product?
HP will leap-frog the LM/X 2.0 product and go directly to LM/X 2.1a.
Many of our customers are anxious for the new functionality in 2.1a.
Since 2.1a is a superset of 2.0, this is what will be offered.
Shipments of LM/X 2.1a are targeted for midyear, 1993. The porting
effort required for 2.x is significant due to architectural differences
between NCR and HP. LAN Manager for UNIX 2.x relies heavily on streams
instead of Berkeley sockets used by HP in the development of LM/X 1.x.
HP's best overall solution with respect to development and strategy is
to use the streams environment.
LM/X 2.1a will be offered on HP9000 RISC-based systems only.
7. Will NCR/AT&T always have a time-to-market advantage?
NCR is the co-developer of the LAN Manager for UNIX product with
Microsoft. As such, they are responsible for the development of future
versions. Today, they are the only vendor shipping a 2.0 product.
Contractually, NCR is obligated to wait a period of time between when
Microsoft delivers the final code to all other OEMs and when NCR ships
their product. None-the-less, they will always enjoy some time-to-
market advantage. HP's intends to limit this as much as possible.
HP's objective is to be among the leaders with LM/X offerings. The
most aggressive schedules possible will be planned to support the
latest in LM/X features.
8. What features are in the LAN Manager for UNIX 2.0 and 2.1 products
from NCR and will these be the same for HP?
The attached message contains information relating to the feature set
of 2.0. HP will support those features which are not NCR/AT&T
proprietary and what the HP-UX OS supports today. The 2.1a code is
still being negotiated by NCR and Microsoft and as such, is not
publicly available yet. Those features from the LAN Manager 2.1 for
OS/2 product most asked for are included in the attached message.